• Sexual Discrimination
• Cases
• Women
• Workplace

Find a Lawyer in Your State

Find a Lawyer by State Alaska Alabama Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware D.C. Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Puerto Rico Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming

Need Help?

Submit your claim details for a free, no obligation case review

 

Get Started:

Find a Lawyer by State Alaska Alabama Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware D.C. Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Puerto Rico Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming

June 22nd, 2004

"Nation''s largest class action lawsuit certified against Wal-Mart"

p>As many as 1.6 million current and former female employees of Wal-Mart Stores Inc. may be represented by the class action lawsuit that was certified by a federal judge for sex discrimination. The largest private civil rights case in U.S. history, the suit alleges Wal-Mart created a system that pays its female workers less than males in comparable jobs, as well as passing women for key promotions on a frequent basis.

The U.S. District Judge Martin Jenkins took nine months before deciding if the class action lawsuit should be expanded to include all women who work or have worked at Wal-Mart''s 3,500 stores nationwide since 1998. Three years prior, when the lawsuit was first filed, Wal-Mart tried to limit the parameters of the ruling. In September, Wal-Mart company attorneys claimed Wal-Mart stores operate with so much autonomy that mini-class action lawsuits targeting each outlet would be more appropriate.

Jenkins'' ruling was based on the 1964 congressional act passed during the civil rights movement that prohibits sex discrimination. The Judge also believed the plaintiffs presented sufficient anecdotal evidence warranting a class-action trial. The ruling could allow for the lawyers representing the women included in the class action lawsuit to pursue punitive damages, back pay, and other compensation.

So far, the Wal-Mart case has already generated 1.25 million pages of evidence and 200 sworn depositions. Wal-Mart plans on appealing the ruling, and no trial date has been set. Wal-Mart is the nation''s largest private employer.