Submit your claim details for a free, no obligation case review
Get Started:
A Virginia Supreme Court judge upheld a multimillion-dollar jury verdict in the asbestos case of a former Newport News shipyard employee who died of mesothelioma, a fatal asbestos-related cancer, in 2005.
Garland F. “Buddy” Jones Jr. worked around asbestos from 1963 to 1967 at Newport News Shipbuilding. Shortly before his death, Jones initiated a lawsuit against John Crane Inc., Johns Manville Corp., and Garlock Sealing Technologies—all manufacturers of industrial materials and parts containing asbestos.
His wife of 41 years, Wanda T. Jones, continued the wrongful death lawsuit after Jones died and was awarded $10.4 million in July 2006. The jury said John Crane was responsible for $3.4 million of the total verdict. The other two defendants settled for undisclosed amounts prior to the jury's decision.
Appeal Rejected
John Crane appealed the verdict, but the court unanimously rejected the company's appeal. Wanda Jones did not live to see the verdict upheld—she died three weeks ago of a cancer not related to asbestos exposure.
The Jones' three children are the beneficiaries of the award. Ansley Higginbotham, their daughter, said they are grateful the judge upheld the verdict.
“It's a bittersweet day for our family. It was important to our mother to receive justice in this case. She worked very tirelessly to make it happen, and I'm very proud of her for seeing it through during such a difficult time. She did not allow such a big company to intimidate her,” Higginbotham said.
(Source: Dailypress.com)
Diagnosed with mesothelioma? Learn more about your legal rights by contacting an experienced asbestos lawyer today.
Copyright © 2001 - 2012 Online Lawyer Source
ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT—Thank you for your visit. The content published on this website was not written by medical professionals and should not, at any point, be mistaken for medical advice. Furthermore, the information on this site is intended for educational purposes only and should never interfere with a patient/site visitor and his or her healthcare provider. In addition, viewing the content on this website, requesting additional information, or transmitting information through a contact form should never be considered the formation of an attorney-client relationship. The material published on this site is general and may not apply to your specific circumstances. Every case comes with its own set of unique circumstances; past success discussed on this site does not guarantee future performance. Information found on this website should not be used as incentive to act without seeking counsel from a professional. For more information, please read our disclaimer.