Submit your claim details for a free, no obligation case review.
Get Started:
The fate of a 6-year-old boy living in Delaware could set a precedent for how US-international divorce custody cases are fought and won. A custody battle between the boy’s parents, Henry and Jody Baxter, recently ended with the Philadelphia US 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals ruling that the boy must be returned to his father in Australia. This decision followed another by Delaware US District Judge Joseph Farnan Jr. that said the boy could remain in the US living with his mother and her boyfriend.
The findings of the Philadelphia Court said that because of The Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, an agreement between the United States and 50 other countries, the boy must be returned. The decision is controversial because no precedent has been set in international child custody disputes between states.
In this particular case, 43-year-old Delaware native Jody Baxter returned back to Delaware after living in Australia for most of the past 18 years. The move back to the US was supposed to be a temporary vacation, according to husband Henry Baxter. While in Delaware Jody Baxter met another man, began a relationship with him, and told her husband she wanted a divorce.
Henry Baxter then filed a US federal court action asking for his son to be sent back to Australia. Jody Baxter and her son had bought one-way air tickets to Delaware and the wife had long been complaining of unfair living conditions. The couple had been living in the harsh Australian Outback for most of their relationship.
The decision does not grant custody to Mr. Baxter, rather it allows for the custody dispute to be settled in Australia, the man’s home country and where he met and married his wife.
Copyright © 2001 - 2012 Online Lawyer Source
ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT—Thank you for your visit. The content published on this website was not written by medical professionals and should not, at any point, be mistaken for medical advice. Furthermore, the information on this site is intended for educational purposes only and should never interfere with a patient/site visitor and his or her healthcare provider. In addition, viewing the content on this website, requesting additional information, or transmitting information through a contact form should never be considered the formation of an attorney-client relationship. The material published on this site is general and may not apply to your specific circumstances. Every case comes with its own set of unique circumstances; past success discussed on this site does not guarantee future performance. Information found on this website should not be used as incentive to act without seeking counsel from a professional. For more information, please read our disclaimer.