Submit your claim details for a free, no obligation case review.
Get Started:
The Supreme Court ruled in a 7-2 decision that U.S. immigration authorities cannot indefinitely detain illegal aliens convicted of crimes in this country who have completed their prison sentences.
The order was in response to court challenges and conflicting decisions by separate U.S. courts of appeal involving two Cubans, Sergio Suarez Martinez and Daniel Benitez, among 920 immigrants who came to the U.S. in June 1980 as part of the “Mariel boatlift”. Later denied lawful permanent residence because of criminal conviction in the United States, Daniel Benitez has remained in custody since 1993 and Sergio Martinez since 2000.
Both of the men completed their sentences in 2001 but have remained as detainees within U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement under a 1996 law tightening restrictions on criminal aliens. There are nearly 2,300 illegal aliens who have completed their U.S. sentences on a variety of criminal charges being detained by U.S. immigration authorities.
According to Justice Antonin Scalia, writing in the majority opinion, “The government fears that the security of our borders will be compromised if it must release into the country inadmissible aliens who cannot be removed,” adding that, “if that is so, Congress can attend to it.” The Justice Department echoed Justice Sandra Day O''Connor''s prediction of chaos, warning thousands, perhaps tens of thousands, of state criminal sentences would be unraveled.
The ruling means the federal government must release, according to one count, about 1,200 criminal aliens into society. The two Mariel exiles committed crimes in the U.S. including assault with a deadly weapon, burglary, armed robbery, aggravated battery, carrying a concealed weapon and attempted oral copulation by force, in addition to other crimes.
Copyright © 2001 - 2012 Online Lawyer Source
ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT—Thank you for your visit. The content published on this website was not written by medical professionals and should not, at any point, be mistaken for medical advice. Furthermore, the information on this site is intended for educational purposes only and should never interfere with a patient/site visitor and his or her healthcare provider. In addition, viewing the content on this website, requesting additional information, or transmitting information through a contact form should never be considered the formation of an attorney-client relationship. The material published on this site is general and may not apply to your specific circumstances. Every case comes with its own set of unique circumstances; past success discussed on this site does not guarantee future performance. Information found on this website should not be used as incentive to act without seeking counsel from a professional. For more information, please read our disclaimer.