Submit your claim details for a free, no obligation case review.
Get Started:
Two studies were released yesterday, concluding states that repeal laws like helmet requirements on motorcycles run the risk of increasing the number of deaths and health care costs as a result.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration conducted the first study, and it found that in the three years following Florida’s decision to repeal its mandatory helmet law in 2000 that there were 933 motorcyclists killed. The number of Florida motorcycle deaths increased 81 percent, an increase from the 515 bikers killed from 1997 to 1999.
While Florida law requires helmet use by riders under 21, fatalities among that group nearly tripled in the three years after the repeal, and 45 percent of those killed were not wearing helmets. When adjusted for inflation, the cost of hospital care for motorcycle injuries grew from $21 million to $44 million in the 30 months after the helmet law was repealed.
The study’s findings resembled a 2003 federal review that found fatalities grew by more than 50 percent in Kentucky and 100 percent in Louisiana after the two states eliminated its mandatory helmet laws. In a second study also released yesterday by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, it found the death rate of motorcyclists from 2001 to 2002 increased 25 percent compared with the two years before Florida did away with the helmet law.
Twenty states and the District of Columbia all require motorcycle riders to wear protective helmets, which is significantly less than the 47 states that required helmets in 1975. In 2004, the number of fatalities resulting from motorcycle accidents nationwide increased nearly eight percent to 4,008. That was the first year since 1987 that motorcycle deaths exceeded 4,000 since 1987.
Over the past seven years, motorcycle deaths have increased every single year.
Copyright © 2001 - 2012 Online Lawyer Source
ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT—Thank you for your visit. The content published on this website was not written by medical professionals and should not, at any point, be mistaken for medical advice. Furthermore, the information on this site is intended for educational purposes only and should never interfere with a patient/site visitor and his or her healthcare provider. In addition, viewing the content on this website, requesting additional information, or transmitting information through a contact form should never be considered the formation of an attorney-client relationship. The material published on this site is general and may not apply to your specific circumstances. Every case comes with its own set of unique circumstances; past success discussed on this site does not guarantee future performance. Information found on this website should not be used as incentive to act without seeking counsel from a professional. For more information, please read our disclaimer.