Submit your claim details for a free, no obligation case review.
Get Started:
A recent case in which a Baltimore County judge barred the use of fingerprint evidence in a homicide trial reflects a growing concern about the reliability of the long-used identification technique.
In her ruling, Judge Susan M. Souder described fingerprinting as “a subjective, untested, unverifiable identification procedure that purports to be infallible.” She is believed to be the first U.S. judge to exclude fingerprint evidence for such a reason.
Prosecutors Shocked
The decision came as a shock to prosecutors who immediately sought to delay the trial of a young man accused of killing a merchant at Security Square Mall in 2006.
“This ruling virtually overturns 100 years of jurisprudence with respect to the admissibility of latent fingerprint evidence,” said prosecutor Jason League.
Fingerprint Evidence Under Scrutiny
For over a century, fingerprint evidence has been a kind of gold standard for identifying crime suspects. However, some critics argue that fingerprint identification is as much a skill as it is a science—a skill that relies on human evaluation, and humans make mistakes.
“Basically, it’s a ‘trust me’ forensic science and that’s scary,” said mathematician Sandy L. Zabell of Northwestern University.
Fingerprint analysts match the intricate patterns of swirls, loops and arches on the fingers and palms using a meticulous process. Still, critics say their methods are not infallible.
“They dramatically oversell their opinion. The claim of 100 percent certainty is absurd. There is no recognition (of) how blurry the lines are between those choices, the amount of gray area there is in making these decisions,” said Robert Epstein, assistant federal public defender in Philadelphia.
Case in Point
Judge Souder cited the case of Oregon attorney Brandon Mayfield, who the FBI linked by fingerprint evidence to the 2004 terrorist bombing in Madrid, Spain. The prints belonged to another man, and Mayfield received an official apology from the Justice Department and a $2 million award.
(Source: Baltimore Sun online)
Accused of a crime? Make sure your rights are fully protected. Contact an experienced criminal defense attorney near you today.
Copyright © 2001 - 2012 Online Lawyer Source
ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT—Thank you for your visit. The content published on this website was not written by medical professionals and should not, at any point, be mistaken for medical advice. Furthermore, the information on this site is intended for educational purposes only and should never interfere with a patient/site visitor and his or her healthcare provider. In addition, viewing the content on this website, requesting additional information, or transmitting information through a contact form should never be considered the formation of an attorney-client relationship. The material published on this site is general and may not apply to your specific circumstances. Every case comes with its own set of unique circumstances; past success discussed on this site does not guarantee future performance. Information found on this website should not be used as incentive to act without seeking counsel from a professional. For more information, please read our disclaimer.