Call Today: 877-612-9867
Contact us for free information or to start a free case review.
Ever since Accutane made its 1982 U.S. debut, intended to treat severe forms of acne that failed to respond to other treatments, it has been the source of medical and regulatory controversy. Now, a Florida lawsuit against Accutane drugmaker Hoffmann-La Roche is charging the company disregarded its internal doctor''s recommendation that users of the drug are monitored for signs of depression and that a warning indicating this is added to the label.
According to evidence, Hoffmann-La Roche marketing officials argued such Accutane warnings could cost the firm sales or prompt lawsuits. Both the doctor''s recommendation and the marketing debate have so far not been publicized in Accutane''s over 20-year controversy.
No official findings link Accutane to depression or any other psychiatric illnesses, but Roche''s global head of drug safety, Martin Huber, testified in a pretrial deposition for the Florida case that the firm''s internal analysis showed Accutane “probably caused” depression and other psychiatric illnesses in some patients, according to the court file summary of his deposition.
Huber also testified that the FDA and Roche consultants had told company officials the rate of depression among Accutane users was 1.5 times higher than among non-users, according to the summary. Roche''s global head of drug regulatory affairs, Daniel Zabrowski, testified separately that a company doctor, Peter Schifferdecker, based at the Basel, Switzerland headquarters, studied data on depression and other adverse psychiatric events reported by Accutane patients in 1997.
According to the summary of Zabrowski''s deposition testimony, Schifferdecker wrote a report recommending changes in Accutane''s U.S. label and core data sheet, the internal company document used by Roche to ensure consistency of the firm''s products worldwide. Legal summaries of depositions by Zabrowski, as well as other Roche officials, show Schifferdecker recommended Accutane''s U.S. label warn users “should be supervised for signs of depression during therapy and, if necessary, referred for appropriate treatment.”
Records in the Florida case show that Roche modified the core data sheet to reflect Schifferdecker''s recommendation, but Zabrowski testified Roche''s marketing division was worried the monitoring warning on Accutane''s U.S. label could hurt sales. Medical consultants in the marketing department revised Schifferdecker''s report to remove the reference to monitoring, which was then sent to the FDA, according to the summary of Zabrowski''s deposition.
There are also internal records of another marketing staffer who wrote an email stating any decision that would “add the proposed label change” should not be finalized “without full consideration of the enhancements to Dr. Schifferdecker''s report.” Currently, Roche is the target of about 70 lawsuits for allegations of adverse reactions because of Accutane. Plaintiffs claim Accutane adverse effects include suicides, depression, birth defects and gastrointestinal injuries.
The internal Roche documents and employee testimony comes at an especially bad time. At the end of September, Merck''s arthritis pain reliever Vioxx was recalled. IN an already heightened scrutiny of drug companies and of the FDA''s oversight of the industry, an FDA whistleblower testifying in front of a Senate panel last month regarding the Vioxx recall named Accutane as one of the five drugs currently on the market that should be studied for a possible withdrawal due to safety concerns.
Copyright © 2001 - 2012 Online Lawyer Source
ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT—Thank you for your visit. The content published on this website was not written by medical professionals and should not, at any point, be mistaken for medical advice. Furthermore, the information on this site is intended for educational purposes only and should never interfere with a patient/site visitor and his or her healthcare provider. In addition, viewing the content on this website, requesting additional information, or transmitting information through a contact form should never be considered the formation of an attorney-client relationship. The material published on this site is general and may not apply to your specific circumstances. Every case comes with its own set of unique circumstances; past success discussed on this site does not guarantee future performance. Information found on this website should not be used as incentive to act without seeking counsel from a professional. For more information, please read our disclaimer.