Submit your claim details for a free, no obligation case review.
Get Started:
A group of protesters who sued Humboldt County, California Law Enforcement officials have been awarded $750,000 this past Saturday. The lawsuit stemmed from an incident in 1997 when several protesters had “chained” themselves together and refused to leave the properties at two sites: Rep. Frank Riggs'' Eureka office, and the Scotia offices of the Pacific Lumber Co.
During those incidents, the group was protesting nonviolently and had locked themselves together using complicated armbands that were made with steel. The police were videotaped in the incident wiping swabs of pepper spray directly on the eyes of the protestors who began to scream in pain.
The protests surrounded the logging industry in the redwood areas of Northern California. Pacific Lumber and then Representative Frank Riggs were seen as acting together in ramping up the number of old-growth redwood trees that they were logging. Some redwood trees can live over hundreds of years old, but many of the older generation of trees have disappeared due to over-logging in the Pacific Northwest.
As part of the suit, the protestors accused the officers of using excessive force by wiping their eyes with the substance. The lawsuit showed that the officers did have alternative means at their disposal, including cutting saws that wouldn''t have cut the protestors themselves.
The lawsuit''s end comes as a relief to many, especially because it took so long to try. The case was tried several times without any outcome over the past eight years. The award was significant, however, and many are hopeful that it will change illegal police practices in California and around the country.
Copyright © 2001 - 2012 Online Lawyer Source
ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT—Thank you for your visit. The content published on this website was not written by medical professionals and should not, at any point, be mistaken for medical advice. Furthermore, the information on this site is intended for educational purposes only and should never interfere with a patient/site visitor and his or her healthcare provider. In addition, viewing the content on this website, requesting additional information, or transmitting information through a contact form should never be considered the formation of an attorney-client relationship. The material published on this site is general and may not apply to your specific circumstances. Every case comes with its own set of unique circumstances; past success discussed on this site does not guarantee future performance. Information found on this website should not be used as incentive to act without seeking counsel from a professional. For more information, please read our disclaimer.