• Guidant Heart Defibrillators
• Defibrillator Risks
• Guidant Pacemaker Recall
• Guidant Recall
• Internal Defibrillator
• Lawyer
• Recall Timeline
• Recalled Defibrillators

Find a Lawyer in Your State

Find a Lawyer by State Alaska Alabama Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware D.C. Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Puerto Rico Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming

Need Help?

Submit your claim details for a free, no obligation case review

 

Get Started:

Find a Lawyer by State Alaska Alabama Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware D.C. Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Puerto Rico Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming

June 2nd, 2005

"Guidant could face legal and regulatory problems for flawed heart aid"

The New York Times and Wall Street Journal reported Guidant Corp. continued to sell potentially flawed implantable heart defibrillators for months after making changes to the device to fix an electrical problem. Reports indicate Guidant could face legal and regulatory problems for selling older devices with a possible flaw while improved ones were available.

The device is called the Ventak Prizm 2 DR Model 1861, and it is implanted under the skin in the chest to shock a chaotically beating heart back into a normal rhythm. According to reports, the company told doctors last week that it had fixed the flaw in devices produced after mid-2002, but the Times said data provided by Guidant to a Minnesota hospital suggests old versions continued to sell.

At Abbott Northwestern Hospital in Minneapolis, nine patients received implants of defibrillators made before April 2002 from May to September 2002. A 21-year old college student died after receiving the device –which the company identified as one of the 26 cases of malfunction.

Guidant urged doctors last week not to replace older units because the risks of replacing them outweighed dangers of the actual device. The company issued a statement to the Times saying it believed reliability data showed that even with improved devices, older versions were still reliable.

Request more detailed Guidant recall information and submit your potential case for a free and confidential consultation by contacting our experienced product liability lawyers.