Submit your Medical Malpractice claim details for a free, no obligation case review.
Get Started:
Legal malpractice limitation involves the rules and exceptions regarding statutes of limitation and the burden of proof that rests on a plaintiff in a legal malpractice case. Legal malpractice limitation might restrict the rights of a victim of legal malpractice. These specific provisions in the law and other legal malpractice limitation specifics can be avoided with the help of a qualified and experienced attorney who can help a victim of legal malpractice to receive adequate monetary compensation for the damages they have suffered because of a negligent or fraudulent attorney.
Legal malpractice is defined as and negligent or willful act carried out by an attorney that is injurious to their client. Negligence is the most common type of legal malpractice; occurring when an attorney fails to provide the level of legal service that would be expected from a similarly situated professional. A legal malpractice case may charge an attorney with breech of fiduciary duty; meaning that s/he has failed to act in the best interest of the client. A breech of contract can also occur in legal malpractice cases when an attorney fails to comply with duties outlined in a contract.
Legal malpractice limitations on damage awards to the plaintiff can occur when the alleged victim of legal malpractice is unable to prove that malpractice was the cause of their injury. The burden of proof in a legal malpractice case rests on the plaintiff. A plaintiff must prove four things in order to be eligible to receive damages in a legal malpractice case.
The alleged victim must prove that: 1) the defendant had a duty to act as established by a attorney-client relationship, 2) that the defendant was in breech of these duties through the actions in question, 3) that the attorney''s action or inaction caused the damages in question, and 4) the specific damages that were suffered as a result of legal malpractice must be demonstrated. If any of these things cannot be proven legal malpractice limitation might hinder or bar a plaintiff from receiving compensation in a legal malpractice case.
Legal malpractice limitation provisions also concern the statutes of limitation that restrict the time between the injurious action/inaction in question and the filing of a legal claim. There are two areas of legal malpractice where these limitations are relevant. In the initial case where legal malpractice is alleged, injury to a client might have been caused by an attorney''s failure to act before the statute of limitations ran out. There are also statutes of legal malpractice limitation that apply to the time in which a person can file a legal malpractice suit.
Legal malpractice limitation can affect the attorney-defendant and the client-plaintiff in a number of ways depending on the specific circumstances surrounding the legal malpractice case in question. In order to protect and maximize your rights in a legal malpractice case, it is important to seek the help of a competent and experienced attorney who knows the laws and all possible legal malpractice limitation provisions that might apply to your case.
New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer has opened a probe on legal malpractice insurance. His latest inquiry is a new area of an investigation that began with accusations of bid rigging and kickbacks among insurers and brokers.
Spitzer''s i...
Copyright © 2001 - 2009 Online Lawyer Source | Legal Marketing Site Designed by eJustice