Contact us for free information or to start a free case review.
Metabolife International is a diet supplement company with its main office in San Diego, CA. William Bradley, Michael Ellis and Michael Blevins started Metabolife in the early 1990s. Both Ellis and Blevins had been previously caught and charged with manufacturing and dealing methamphetamine in 1988.
During the 1990s the company made billions of dollars on its Metabolife 365 product, an ephedra-containing diet supplement. In 1999 the number of people using ephedra products numbered into 12 million. Metabolife 365 came under intense investigation after several people who were taking the supplement died or became seriously ill.
In April of 2004, the FDA banned ephedra for use in any products. In 2005 the ban was reversed but with limits on the amount of ephedra that can be used.
Metabolife has been the target of hundreds of government investigations, civil lawsuits, and other controversies. A grand jury found Michael Ellis, then CEO of Metabolife, guilty of lying to federal regulators about the safety of Metabolife 365. Michael Blevins pleaded guilty to weapons charges and faces up to two years in federal prison. William Bradley admitted to illegal tax evasion strategies that the company often used when filing its business reports.
In one case, Bradley paid about $6.4 million to a nonprofit that he had setup called The Bradley Foundation. The money was hidden from corporate taxation because it was allegedly a nonprofit educational foundation. In just one year, from 1997-1998 Bradley deposited over $4 million in various hidden bank accounts and then split up the funds between the three company founders.
Following the scandals, Metabolife filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in July of 2005. The company also announced the possibility of a sale of its assets to another company, IdeaSphere Inc., for $23.5 million. In September of 2005 IdeaSphere pulled out of its offer, however, saying that Metabolife did not follow business operating-procedures since filing bankruptcy. The company''s assets will be sold under Section 363 of the California Bankruptcy Code.
As many as 155 deaths and over 1,400 other adverse affects were linked to ephedra and ephedra containing products. Many of the supplements called their ephedra by its other name on their ingredient list: ma huang. Some of the side effects included:
In one of hundreds of lawsuits against Metabolife, a jury awarded Rhea McAllister $7.4 million, to be paid by Metabolife. The woman had suffered brain damage from a stroke while taking Metabolife diet supplements that included ephedra.
Ephedra, the main ingredient of the now-banned Metabolife 365, was once very widely available and used by dieters and bodybuilders. The stimulant increased heart rate and constricted blood vessels. It was widely used in sports and was seen as responsible for the death of Baltimore Orioles pitching potential Steve Bechler.
If you have experienced side effects, please contact an Ephedra lawyer to learn more about your legal rights.
Two men filed personal injury lawsuits against Pfizer, alleging that the pharmaceutical giant concealed serious health risks associated with its popular cholesterol drug Lipitor.
The lawsuits accuse Pfizer of promoting Lipitor as a safe drug w...
A pseudoephedrine lawsuit filed in Oklahoma is being closely watched around the country because it is the first of its kind.
The suit is being filed by the widow of an Oklahoma State Trooper who was killed by an illegal drug dealer and manufac...
Drug giant Eli Lilly and Co., manufacturer of such blockbuster drugs as Prozac and Zyprexa have pled guilty to a misdemeanor charge as a part of a legal settlement with the US government. The US charged that Eli Lilly had been marketing its drug Evista...
Copyright © 2001 - 2012 Online Lawyer Source | Legal Marketing Site Designed by eJustice
ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT—Thank you for your visit. The content published on this website was not written by medical professionals and should not, at any point, be mistaken for medical advice. Furthermore, the information on this site is intended for educational purposes only and should never interfere with a patient/site visitor and his or her healthcare provider. In addition, viewing the content on this website, requesting additional information, or transmitting information through a contact form should never be considered the formation of an attorney-client relationship. The material published on this site is general and may not apply to your specific circumstances. Every case comes with its own set of unique circumstances; past success discussed on this site does not guarantee future performance. Information found on this website should not be used as incentive to act without seeking counsel from a professional. For more information, please read our disclaimer.