Call Today: 800-417-9951
Contact us for free information or to start a free case review.
AvandiaŽ side effects have sparked much controversy around use of the medication. Produced by GlaxoSmithKline, AvandiaŽ is an oral thiazolidinedione medication prescribed in the treatment of type-2 diabetes, also referred to as adult-onset diabetes. AvandiaŽ improves the body's control of blood sugar levels by making cells throughout the body more receptive to insulin.
AvandiaŽ is generically known as rosiglitazone and is NOT indicated for treatment of type-1 diabetes, also referred to as juvenile diabetes.
Despite being an effective anti-diabetes medication, however, AvandiaŽ has been reported to cause some rare but serious side effects, including:
AvandiaŽ patients who sustain such injuries will likely have a legal claim or an AvandiaŽ lawsuit against GlaxoSmithKline and will be entitled to seek a settlement for their injuries and losses.
It's important that AvandiaŽ patients understand the symptoms of serious AvandiaŽ side effects so they know when to seek emergency medical care to prevent further damage to their health.
Symptoms of severe AvandiaŽ side effects may include (but aren't limited to):
Upon an official diagnosis of severe AvandiaŽ side effects, doctors will typically recommend some combination of the following treatments:
The precise type of medication(s) doctors prescribe for AvandiaŽ side effects will depend on:
Medications commonly prescribed to treat AvandiaŽ side effects include:
After an injured AvandiaŽ patient has received the treatment(s) he/she needs, it's also important that he consult with an experienced defective drug attorney to learn more about his/her legal rights.
During a free initial consultation, injured parties (including families of deceased AvandiaŽ patients) can:
AvandiaŽ lawyers work on a contingency fee basis to encourage injured patients to seek the settlements they deserve.
For more information about AvandiaŽ side effects, contact an Avandia lawyer today.
AvandiaŽ was FDA approved in May 1999 for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. An oral agent, AvandiaŽ is supposed to be used in addition to diet and exercise to improve blood sugar control. In March 2000, the Public Citizen consumer group petitioned the FDA for the immediate revision of "inadequate, misleading, and potentially dangerous professional product labeling" for the diabetes drugs referred to as "glitazones", which include Rezulin, AvandiaŽ and Actos.
According to the consumer group, AvandiaŽ and the other two glitazone drugs were approved as adjuncts to diet and exercise in order to improve blood sugar control in type 2 diabetes patients but the drug labeling was inadequate and did not mention safety and efficacy information that appeared relevant to all three drugs in the class. The failure to include the lack of efficacy compared to already available drugs, in addition to the deterioration of blood sugar levels when patients are switched from other anti-diabetic drugs to AvandiaŽ was not mentioned.
AvandiaŽ side effects, such as liver toxicity, heart function effects, weight gain, edema, anemia, low blood pressure, elevated lipid levels, and possible progesterone level changes were also nowhere to be found on AvandiaŽ and other glitazone labelings. Rezulin was the first drug of the AvandiaŽ inclusive class to be approved and was already banned in Great Britain at the time of the Public Citizen FDA petition. By 2000, Rezulin was recalled in the U.S. because of the instances of liver damage leading to death, necessity of liver transplants, and damage that occurred and has led to thousands of Rezulin lawsuits.
GlaxoSmithKline, AvandiaŽ''s manufacturer, is currently investing $300 million for long-term AvandiaŽ side effects studies. It can take years and years to better determine safety concerns beyond the FDA approval process because of the clinical trials that fail to show the overall effect a drug can have on a wider scope of patients. While many studies can involve a high number of people, it will still leave out many groups or not be able to show a drug risk that becomes more apparent as adverse event reports are made. In recent years, finding subjects is considered the number one obstacle in getting drug trials completed.
PPH, an uncommon clinical syndrome causing the blood pressure in the pulmonary artery to rise far above normal levels, is a difficult diagnosis of exclusion that has been linked to the use of some drugs. Due to the complexity of the rare lung disorder, it is often mistaken for other things. AvandiaŽ side effects include edema, the buildup of fluid that can cause swelling in ankles or legs.
Commonly, PPH sufferers will show symptoms that often include edema. Since the PPH is commonly not diagnosed until it has progressed a long way and the side effects have become apparent, patients should be aware of AvandiaŽ side effects that may be indicators of more serious conditions. Type 2 diabetes currently affects about 16 million Americans but the AvandiaŽ side effects should be fully understood before choosing the treatment method. AvandiaŽ is not appropriate for all patients and some AvandiaŽ side effects can be significantly more prevalent in certain people.
The FDA announced that is has made a change regarding cardiovascular risks to the Avandia® (rosiglitazone) label and patient Medication Guide, Feb. 4, 2011.
The FDA announcement also said that Avandia®'s drug label was updated ...
A government run diabetes trial was halted 18 months early after a safety analysis revealed an increased risk of death in patients whose blood sugar levels dipped too low.
The 10,000 patient trial was examining the effectiveness of aggressive ...
A new study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association reaffirms previous findings about the diabetes drug Avandia—that is, it carries a significantly increased risk of heart failure, heart attack, and death.
Ob...
Copyright Š 2001 - 2012 Online Lawyer Source | Legal Marketing Site Designed by eJustice
ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT—Thank you for your visit. The content published on this website was not written by medical professionals and should not, at any point, be mistaken for medical advice. Furthermore, the information on this site is intended for educational purposes only and should never interfere with a patient/site visitor and his or her healthcare provider. In addition, viewing the content on this website, requesting additional information, or transmitting information through a contact form should never be considered the formation of an attorney-client relationship. The material published on this site is general and may not apply to your specific circumstances. Every case comes with its own set of unique circumstances; past success discussed on this site does not guarantee future performance. Information found on this website should not be used as incentive to act without seeking counsel from a professional. For more information, please read our disclaimer.